 |
| weight loss vs sliding distance |
weight loss vs sliding distance
In the context of weight loss, the aim generally is to lose weight, which is a physical change, not an alteration of one\'s identity. In fact, in our study, respondents were only concerned with the physical change they could make by losing weight, without considering the effect on their identity. '
As a result of the weight loss program, the participants had a greater body mass index (BMI) and a greater percentage of body fat in relation to their body weight. There was a significant decrease in body mass index among all the participants after the program, meaning that body mass index tended to decrease, however, this was not statistically significant. There was no significant change in the percentage of body fat of the participants in the control group. However, the percentage of body fat of the participants in the intervention group tended to increase after the program (Hilderbrand and Hilderbrand, 2010, p. 3).
A common misconception of the "distance running effect" is that the distance covered by a runner changes as the pace increases. The effect is actually more subtle than that: over time, it becomes more and more difficult to increase the speed with each stride, and as a consequence, the runners’ pace keeps increasing, but not their stride frequency. Thus, the distance that is covered by a runner is actually independent of the pace and depends only on the stride rate and the number of strides. The higher the stride rate, however, the lower the stride frequency, and the shorter the distance that a runner will cover per minute if the pace remains constant.
The main aim of this study was to analyze if there is a relationship between weight loss and sliding distance. A secondary aim was to analyze if there is a relationship between sliding distance and the physical activity of the participants.
The current study proposes the sliding distance as the primary parameter of interest. In the present study, a total of 24 individuals (15 males and 9 females; mean age = 25.7 yr, SD = 5.3) completed a series of three weight-loss trials, each of which required participants to descend a 4.4 m (15.1 ft) stepladder in a single bound. The trials were separated by a day (7 d) and all trials were completed in a single session. Each trial was divided into 5 sections: the first 2.6 m (8.5 ft) were performed at an initial speed of 6.5 m/s (21.8 ft/s) while the final 1.9 m
20 Weight loss supplements Reviews --> Realth US
0 Response to "weight loss vs sliding distance"
Post a Comment
Please do not enter any spam link in the comment box